13 October 2006


National Assembly passes draft law criminalising the denial of Armenian genocide

Incident details


This is available in:

English Français
(RSF/IFEX) - RSF strongly regrets the first reading passage of a law that would make it a crime punishable by prison sentence to deny the 1915 Armenian genocide. The organisation notes that memorial laws are part of the creation of an official historical truth - a practice typical of totalitarian regimes - and expressed the hope that senators, who are to examine the draft law shortly, will have the wisdom to reject it.

The French National Assembly passed the draft law on 12 October 2006. The law would make denial of the Armenian genocide a crime punishable by five years in jail and a 45,000-euro fine.
The law complements a 19 January 2001 law which publicly recognised the genocide.

"There is obviously no question of going back on the recognition of the Armenian genocide, but legislating on it will expose anyone denying it to harsh judicial penalties set out by the 18 July 1881 law on press freedom (Article 24a). Memorial laws contribute to the creation of an official historical truth. This practice, typical of totalitarian regimes, is incompatible with France's fundamental values, starting with freedom of expression," said the organisation.

"Not only is it absurd that free expression ­ however contestable, and that is not the question ­ should be subjected to a constraint which is, in addition, a threat, but it seems to us that this legalistic concept of history will be much more likely to stoke up antagonism than to promote debate.

"It is particularly symbolic that this vote should have been held on the same day of the awarding of the Nobel Prize for literature to Orhan Pamuk, who was himself taken to court by the Turkish authorities for having raised the issue of this genocide," RSF stressed.

RSF hopes that senators due to examine the law on second reading will pay less attention to upcoming elections and have the wisdom to reject it. If not, it could have incalculable consequences for all historians as well as for press freedom.


Putting free expression issues in perspective.

Sign up to receive IFEX In Context.

More from France
  • Freedom on the Net 2017: France

    Concerns about the impact of disinformation and political bot operations heightened in the run-up to the 2017 French presidential election, as leaked communications related to candidate Emmanuel Macron were dumped online and amplified by automated accounts in attempts to destabilize the race right before campaigning closed

  • Freedom of the Press 2017: France

    A new law strengthening core aspects of media freedom was approved by the parliament in October, though a section of it that bolstered journalists’ right to protect their sources was later struck down.

  • Freedom of the Press 2016: France

    Government pushed through legislation allowing mass surveillance of personal communications with little judicial oversight, and authorities arrested 54 people for hate speech or for allegedly defending terrorism.

At this point, would publish: "Home page"
At this point, would publish: "Proposed law prohibiting denial of Armenian genocide violates free expression, says ARTICLE 19"
At this point, would publish: "Persecuted Turkish writers oppose proposed law criminalising denial of Armenian genocide"
At this point, would publish: "Legislating "historical facts" undermines intellectual freedom, says report"
At this point, would publish: "Senate must reject Armenian Genocide law, says ARTICLE 19"
IFEX is a global network of committed organisations working to defend and promote free expression.
Permission is granted for material on this website to be reproduced or republished in whole or in part provided the source member and/or IFEX is cited with a link to the original item.