30 September 2011


Countries start signing anti-counterfeiting accord that was negotiated secretly

This is available in:

English Français
(RSF/IFEX) - 29 September 2011 - Japan and other countries that have already completed the required domestic procedures will sign the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) in a ceremony in Tokyo on 1 October. Governments have until May 2013 to sign the accord, which 37 countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia, Singapore, Switzerland and the European Union, negotiated without consulting their public or civil society.

Mexico is one of the countries that will not attend the ceremony although it participated in the negotiations. The Mexican senate adopted a resolution on 22 June asking the government not to sign it. Other countries, including Brazil, Russia and India, have publicly expressed their opposition to the accord.

The European Parliament adopted a pro-ACTA resolution on 24 November 2010 while pointing out that it was "fully aware that the agreement negotiated will not solve the complex and multi-dimensional problem of counterfeiting" but regarded it as "a step in the right direction".

Reporters Without Borders urges the European Union and its member countries, especially France, to reject this accord, which contains many elements that violate freedom of expression. A study commissioned by the European Parliament that was released on 20 July stressed the treaty's imperfections and advised against signing it.

In particular, Reporters Without Borders condemns:
* The requirement that signatory countries establish commercial cooperation mechanisms for combating counterfeiting.
* The right accorded to the relevant authorities to ask Internet Service Providers to identify their clients.
* The requirement to criminally prosecute suppression of metadata (data identifying a file's content and origins) and circumvention of Digital Rights Management (DRM).
* The possibility for governments to define legal exceptions to DRM circumvention.

The last two points have the effect of banning censorship circumvention resources that are indispensible tools for ensuring the flow of news and information in countries such as Iran or China.

Finally, Reporters Without Borders reiterates its condemnation of the lack of transparency that surrounded the negotiations. The ACTA's text was not made public until 21 April 2010, when it was released by the European Commission. That was three years after the negotiations had begun.

Earlier this month, Françoise Castex, a French socialist Member of the European Parliament, raised the possibility of referring the ACTA to the European Court of Justice in order to determine whether it complies with European law.

"The Legal Affairs Committee, of which I am a member, has decided to ask the European Parliament's legal service if it complies," Castex told Reporters Without Borders. "I don't know if that will suffice and if the parliament, as it has the possibility, will not have to directly refer it to the European Union's Court of Justice." This would have the effect of suspending adoption of the ACTA.

"The ACTA is an international accord that was negotiated outside the existing multilateral institutions (specifically, the WTO) by the countries that wanted to do it. The countries that were not in agreement did not take part in the negotiations. One wonders what its effect and utility will be," added Castex. Reporters Without Borders encourages Castex's initiative.


Putting free expression issues in perspective.

Sign up to receive IFEX In Context.

More from International
  • Democracy in Retreat: Freedom in the World 2019

    In 2018, Freedom in the World recorded the 13th consecutive year of decline in global freedom. The reversal has spanned a variety of countries in every region, from long-standing democracies like the United States to consolidated authoritarian regimes like China and Russia. The overall losses are still shallow compared with the gains of the late 20th century, but the pattern is consistent and ominous. Democracy is in retreat.

  • List of journalists killed by country in 2018

  • How Apps on Android share data with Facebook (even if you don't have a Facebook account)

    Previous research has shown how 42.55 percent of free apps on the Google Play store could share data with Facebook, making Facebook the second most prevalent third-party tracker after Google’s parent company Alphabet.1 In this report, Privacy International illustrates what this data sharing looks like in practice, particularly for people who do not have a Facebook account.

At this point, would publish: "Home page"
At this point, would publish: "Potential threats to online free expression seen in draft trade treaty"
At this point, would publish: "As ACTA talks resume, new leak confirms fears about threat to online free expression"
At this point, would publish: "Danger of international accord on repressive policies in final ACTA talks, says RSF"
At this point, would publish: "RSF concerned about threat to online free expression from imminent international accord"
IFEX is a global network of committed organisations working to defend and promote free expression.
Permission is granted for material on this website to be reproduced or republished in whole or in part provided the source member and/or IFEX is cited with a link to the original item.