22 October 1997


ARTICLE 19 gives early warning on Jordan as authorities suspend several weekly newspapers

Incident details


(ARTICLE 19/IFEX) - The Jordanian Council of Ministers' recent
orders for several weekly newspapers to suspend publication bears
out the urgent need for reform detailed in "Blaming the Press -
Jordan's Democratization Process in Crisis". This new report from
ARTICLE 19 challenges the Jordanian government's claim to be the
guarantor of its citizens' human rights, given this May's
amendments to the 1993 Law on Press and Publications (see IFEX
alerts). These changes attack freedom of expression and
constitute a major breach of both international law and Jordan's
own Constitution.

Increasing internal criticism of the government's domestic and
foreign policies has provoked a clamp-down on the small
independent media sector, the forum for stories on human rights
abuses, official corruption, mismanagement and debate over
controversial policies and social problems.

The impact on democracy and freedom of expression is already

  • Most opposition parties have decided to boycott the elections
    for the House of Representatives on 4 November, unless the
    government meets certain conditions, including abandoning the May
    1997 press law amendments. ARTICLE 19 recommends the immediate
    repeal of these retrograde measures.

  • At least thirteen weekly newspapers have been suspended by the
    Council of Ministers, one weekly newspaper has been forced to
    close and others to combine.

  • Protests by journalists over the amendments led to arrests,
    detentions and allegations that police physically abused
    demonstrators, allegations denied by the Minister of Information.

    ARTICLE 19 will be highlighting these issues with a seminar for
    journalists and decision-makers in Jordan next week.

    Said Essoulami, Head of ARTICLE 19's Middle East Programme said:

    "Accusing the independent press of bringing Jordan into
    disrepute, introducing laws to stifle it and thus crushing debate
    is a convenient way of offloading responsibility for the
    political and economic problems Jordan is facing, and delaying
    having to respond to them.

    "ARTICLE 19 is concerned that the new amendments represent a real
    set-back to government accountability, debate on matters of
    public interest and respect for human rights. In a democratic
    society, government officials must be able to tolerate being
    scrutinised and criticised both by the public and the media," he

    The press law amendments were ratified by Royal Decree, without
    public or parliamentary debate, shortly after the King expressed
    discontent with the weekly press. The chief claim made against
    this small, privately-owned sector is that its reporting is
    harmful to Jordan's national interests.

    ARTICLE 19's recommendations for early reform in Jordan include:

    1. Ensuring that the constitutional guarantee of freedom of
    expression supersedes legislative restrictions, and establishing
    a comprehensive access to information regime based on public

    2. Exposing and stopping practices aimed at intimidating
    journalists, including harassment through the courts.

    3. Ending mandatory membership of the Jordanian Press
    Association as a condition for being allowed to practise as a

    4. Ending censorship by the Department of Press and
    Publications of books prior to printing and of imported
    newspapers prior to distribution.

    5. Reducing the government share ownership in the daily press
    and ending the state monopoly over the broadcast media.

    6. Abolishing the requirement for a minimum capital sum as a
    pre-condition for setting up a newspaper.

    7. Ending the use of defamation law to stifle criticism or
    debate about issues which may be embarrassing for the government.

  • Source

    ARTICLE 19: Global Campaign for Free Expression
    6-8 Amwell Street
    EC1R 1UQ
    United Kingdom
    info (@) article19.org
    Fax:+44 20 7278 7660
    More from Jordan
    • Freedom on the Net 2017: Jordan

      Prodemocracy activists were detained and prosecuted for their online activities

    • Freedom of the Press 2016: Jordan

      In October, the government ruled that defamation charges against journalists and media outlets would be brought under the cybercrimes law, opening the way for prison sentences for offenders.

    • Freedom on the Net 2015: Jordan

      Facebook posters critical of "friendly" states increasingly under threat of arrest