3 May 2011

Campaigns and Advocacy

People must reclaim media, make their voices heard, says CIJ


(CIJ/IFEX) - 3 May 2011 - World Press Freedom Day, which falls on 3 May, is an occasion to remember the challenges that journalists face in doing their jobs. Although the theme this year is "21st century media: New frontiers, new barriers", in Malaysia, the old barriers still loom large, especially repressive laws that have been so successful in taming print media that they are also used, or are being considered, for new media.

The Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 (PPPA) is one such law that has been so effective in muzzling the traditional media that the federal government is reportedly considering expanding its scope to include new media. Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein's statement that discussions are still at the early stages is hardly reassuring given the federal government's record of amending laws without public consultation with all stakeholder groups, and which usually ends with increased executive power.

The PPPA is a fine example of this. The clause which imposes a licensing regime for all serial publications was amended to remove any prospects of judicial challenge, giving the Minister the final and absolute decision.

At present, the PPPA not only tethers newspapers that are already controlled by the ruling party through direct or indirect ownership, but also opposition party organs, whose applications for new annual permits are constantly delayed. "Suara Keadilan", the monthly publication of Parti Keadilan Rakyat, has not received its permit since it expired on 30 June 2010 and has had to resort to creatively changing the name slightly every month, so as not to violate the law.

The consequences of the PPPA over the years have been dire. Mainstream press editors who have been held "hostage" by the law now accept the executive -"assigned" position of the press as publicist or, worse, propaganda arm - of the federal government. The newspapers report as a matter of fact the executive's intentions and initiatives, such as the Government Transformation Programme (GTP) updates and its first year report, as well as the New Key Results Area (NKRA) Media Blitz campaign by the Rural and Regional Development Ministry. What's more, top editors can be held responsible for coverage of crucial issues that result in unfavourable outcomes for authorities, as "The Star" was over the 9 March 2011 Al-Kitab report.

A hostile environment for press freedom can not only make it difficult for conscientious journalists to practice ethics in their daily work; it also increases the prevalence of self-censorship, resulting in important issues of public interest being suppressed and executive powers dangerously unchecked.

And if before journalists could barely make an unequivocal stand for press freedom, they are silenced now more than ever following the recent sacking of their union president, Mohamed Ha'ta Wahari, for daring to criticise the editors of the newspaper he was working for. On 21 April, a domestic inquiry found the senior "Utusan Malaysia" journalist guilty of tarnishing the newspaper's image in his press interviews and statements. Yet the UMNO-owned newspaper is the subject of a few defamation lawsuits by Federal Opposition politicians and has been actively agitating divisive positions on religion, ethnicity and minority issues to the point that even the MCA has called for a boycott of the newspaper.

There is another threat looming - the federal government has once again raised the proposal for a media council. Although it seems an ideal solution to addressing unethical reporting in a free environment - and may even be welcomed after the recent lows descended to by some mainstream media in a politically motivated attempt to implicate Federal Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim in yet another sex scandal - a media council in the current restrictive setting in Malaysia would essentially act as another level of control.

On World Press Freedom Day, we call on citizens and residents of Malaysia to speak up and reclaim the mainstream media. The recently ended Sarawak elections which saw the Federal Opposition gaining 45% of the popular vote should empower all Malaysians to make their demands heard, especially since a snap general election is expected this year or next.

We call for a parliamentary caucus on freedom of expression to conduct a comprehensive review of existing laws to ensure that they are consistent with the fundamental right to freedom of expression, which includes press freedom.

We demand media plurality, so that the public will have access to a wide variety of sources of information and can choose the media that practises ethical reporting.

It is time for the people to reclaim the mainstream media and help them restore the dignity and respect they once commanded, which will also ensure that journalists are able to do their job - safely, unhindered and ethically.

Source:

Putting free expression issues in perspective.

Sign up to receive IFEX In Context.

Malaysia

IFEX members working in this country 1

 
More from Malaysia
  • Freedom on the Net 2017: Malaysia

    Several websites remain blocked for reporting on a billion dollar corruption scandal implicating Prime Minister Najib Razak, including the publishing platform Medium

  • Malaysia HRW Report: Events of 2016

    Malaysia's human rights situation continued to deteriorate in 2016, with human rights defenders, activists, political opposition figures, and journalists facing harassment and politically motivated prosecution. Those criticising the administration of Prime Minister Najib Razak or commenting on the government's handling of the 1 Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) corruption scandal have been particular targets.

  • Freedom of the Press 2016: Malaysia

    Reporting on the alleged misuse of the 1MDB state investment fund sparked criminal defamation proceedings against at least four news outlets, and two others were temporarily suspended.

 
More from Asia & Pacific
  • TRUTH VS MISINFORMATION: THE COLLECTIVE PUSH BACK

    SOUTH ASIA PRESS FREEDOM REPORT 2018-2019

  • The Campaign for Justice: Press Freedom in South Asia 2013-14

    Journalism in South Asia is far from an easy profession, as the 12th annual review of journalism in the region "The Campaign for Justice: Press Freedom in South Asia 2013-14" portrays. But this year's report also tells the story of the courage of South Asia's journalists to defend press freedom and to ensure citizens' right to information and freedom of expression in the face of increasing challenges to the profession and personal safety.

  • THE STORIES WOMEN JOURNALISTS TELL: Women in Media in South Asia

    The report is the first created by the South Asia Media Solidarity Network (SAMSN) looking specifically at the experience of women journalists in the South Asia sub-region


At this point, would publish cover: "Home page"
At this point, would publish story-with-same-anchor: "Journalist found guilty of "tarnishing newspaper's image""
 
IFEX is a global network of committed organisations working to defend and promote free expression.
Permission is granted for material on this website to be reproduced or republished in whole or in part provided the source member and/or IFEX is cited with a link to the original item.