Nauru elections need free media, advocacy group stresses
"An uninformed democracy is no kind of democracy at all," says PFF Chair Titi Gabi.
"How are voters supposed to make an informed decision on issues facing their country if they cannot access independent information to make their own judgment?"
Government last week reportedly issued a ban on any political coverage by the country's sole media, the state-owned Nauru television and radio station.
The ban was said to have been put in place by President Sprent Dabwido as part of a supposed "state of emergency" over economic conditions.
Finance minister Roland Kun resigned in protest, calling the media ban a "disgrace."
President Dabwido later said there was no ban but that he had issued a directive to media to put all interview requests through him first, to stop MPs attacking each other.
"Pushing media interviews through a presidential office seems neither free nor fair," says Gabi, speaking from Port Moresby.
"Where there is simply no other media, the burden is especially heavy upon government to allow free and open access to state media by all political parties."
PFF co-Chair Monica Miller says the Nauru directive recalls similar edicts imposed by democratically elected governments across the Pacific.
"All over the world, in fact, suppressing information has been proven again and again not to work.
"Whether we are talking tax havens used by the biggest companies fuelling global corruption or self-declared states of emergency in a micro-state like Nauru, the effect is the same - instability."
"An economic crisis - global or local - is the very time people need more information, not less."
Like other Pacific states, Nauru faces a future of ever evolving complexity, says Miller.
"To survive, let alone to compete, Nauru needs to retain its best minds, and attract back people it sends overseas for education.
"Nauru cannot hope to achieve either if it continues to deny citizens basic freedoms, and basic dignities."
PFF is calling on the incoming government to review its media policies and put in place protections for freedom of speech, as guaranteed under the constitution, and by international agreement.