30 June 2006

Alert

Supreme Court rules that some articles of newspaper law are unconstitutional


This is available in:

English Français
(RSF/IFEX) - Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has welcomed a South Korean Supreme Court decision which ruled as unconstitutional some articles of the law on the press and on media arbitration.

"We expressed our fears after the adoption of this controversial law. We are reassured by the Supreme Court decision which is based on the crucial and absolute protection of press freedom," the international press freedom organisation said.

"We call on the deputies of the ruling party and the government to definitively withdraw the draconian articles in the law," RSF added.

On 29 June 2006, the constitutional court blocked the application of some measures in the Act Governing the Guarantee of Freedom and Functions of Newspapers, which had been adopted by parliament on 1 January 2005. This verdict follows an appeal lodged by the leading conservative South Korean newspapers. The government announced on the same day that it would respect the verdict.

The judges voted by seven to two that the law sought by the ruling Uri party was contrary to press freedom and business freedom, guaranteed by the constitution, in that they limited the market share a newspaper could obtain.

"We don't see any particular danger, because readers can freely decide which newspaper they want to read," said the judges. Currently, the three conservative dailies, "Chosun Ilbo", "Dong-a Ilbo" and "JoongAng Ilbo" account for more than 70 percent of the written press market. "Chosun Ilbo" alone has 30 prcent of the readership.

In the same way, parliament will have to amend an article of the law which banned newspaper owners from holding more than 50 percent of the shares in another print or electronic medium.

On the other hand, the Supreme Court confirmed the validity of the articles which oblige media to provide more transparent information about their financial activities and particularly on their revenue from advertising. The right of individuals to demand corrections in the press was also confirmed.

In July 2005, RSF had said it was closely watching how the law on newspapers would be applied. The organisation particularly expressed reservations on the vague concept of the "social responsibility" of the media, included in Articles 4 and 5.



Source

Reporters Without Borders
47, rue Vivienne
75002 Paris
France
rsf (@) rsf.org
Fax:+33 1 45 23 11 51
South Korea
 
More from South Korea
  • Freedom on the Net 2017: South Korea

    Women reported violent threats after they advocated for feminist causes on social media

  • Freedom of the Press 2016: South Korea

    A Japanese journalist was acquitted of defaming President Park in December, but other criminal defamation cases against the media were still making their way through the courts.

  • Freedom on the Net 2015: South Korea

    Nuclear power plants targeted by North Korean cyber attacks

 
More from Asia & Pacific
  • TRUTH VS MISINFORMATION: THE COLLECTIVE PUSH BACK

    SOUTH ASIA PRESS FREEDOM REPORT 2018-2019

  • The Campaign for Justice: Press Freedom in South Asia 2013-14

    Journalism in South Asia is far from an easy profession, as the 12th annual review of journalism in the region "The Campaign for Justice: Press Freedom in South Asia 2013-14" portrays. But this year's report also tells the story of the courage of South Asia's journalists to defend press freedom and to ensure citizens' right to information and freedom of expression in the face of increasing challenges to the profession and personal safety.

  • THE STORIES WOMEN JOURNALISTS TELL: Women in Media in South Asia

    The report is the first created by the South Asia Media Solidarity Network (SAMSN) looking specifically at the experience of women journalists in the South Asia sub-region