13 December 2011

Campaigns and Advocacy

Media Social Responsibility Law violates freedom of expression, says ARTICLE 19


This is available in:

English Español
(ARTICLE 19/IFEX) - Caracas, 10 December 2011 - Ahead of the one-year anniversary of the amendments to Venezuela's Law on Social Responsibilities on Radio, Television and Electronic Media, ARTICLE 19 has reviewed the law's compliance with international freedom of expression standards. The analysis concludes that the law places illegitimate restrictions on freedom of expression and information.

The analysis finds that the law violates international law by requiring all media to broadcast a variety of mandatory content, including all government messages and speeches. It creates numerous regulatory bodies which are under the control of the government instead of independent bodies. It also creates new sanctions for a variety of vague offenses including "encouraging anxiety among the citizenry" and "disregarding legitimate authorities". Finally, the law contains broad provisions for state control over the internet, with all electronic media being regulated in the same way as traditional broadcasting.

"The law contains vague prohibitions, places excessive restrictions on the internet and provides for harsh sanctions against broadcasters" said Paula Martins, Director of ARTICLE 19 South America. "Considering that Venezuela lacks an independent regulator to apply this particular law and other broadcasting related legislation, this creates fertile ground for political and economic interference of the media".

The Law on Social Responsibilities on Radio, Television and Electronic Media was originally adopted in 2004 and has been controversial since its inception. The general purpose of the law is to "establish social responsibility" for all participants in the broadcast sector and "to set a balance between their duties, liberties and rights". It was amended in December 2010 to broadly apply to electronic media, including the internet. The amendments went into effect in February 2011. Controversial since its inception, the law has been applauded by its supporters as modernising the country's communication structure, and condemned by critics as a bare-faced attempt by the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) ruling party to gain control over private broadcast media.

ARTICLE 19 urges the government to amend the law to include safeguards against arbitrary and disproportionate interference with broadcasters and the internet. In addition, the independence of broadcast regulatory bodies should be ensured and unclear internet content restrictions should be removed.

Click here to read ARTICLE 19's complete legal analysis


Source:

Putting free expression issues in perspective.

Sign up to receive IFEX In Context.

 
More from Venezuela
  • Freedom on the Net 2017: Venezuela

    Along with eroding civil and political freedoms, President Nicolas Maduro’s declaration of a State of Exception and Economic Emergency, extended in May 2017, dictated “strict regulations” to prevent “destabilization campaigns” on the internet

  • Freedom of the Press 2017: Venezuela

    Venezuela’s economic crisis continued to affect the media industry, leaving dozens of publications in chronic danger of closure due to the difficulty of meeting basic operational costs. Many outlets also faced robberies, vandalism, and hackings.

  • Freedom of the Press 2016: Venezuela

    The government refused to recognize a decision by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) ordering the reinstatement of the terrestrial broadcast license of television station Radio Caracas Television (RCTV), which was taken off the air in 2007 after a highly politicized campaign against the channel by then president Hugo Chávez.


At this point, would publish: "Home page"
At this point, would publish: "NGO director attacked, threatened"
At this point, would publish: "Legal reforms violate free expression"
At this point, would publish: "National Assembly approves legal reform allowing for regulation of Internet"
At this point, would publish: "CPJ condemns two media laws"
At this point, would publish: "Laws approved by legislature pose serious threats to free speech, civil society, says Human Rights Watch"
At this point, would publish: "Media reforms would be a blow to freedom of expression"
 
IFEX is a global network of committed organisations working to defend and promote free expression.
Permission is granted for material on this website to be reproduced or republished in whole or in part provided the source member and/or IFEX is cited with a link to the original item.