27 March 2008


Supreme Court declares ban against journalist null and void

Incident details

Brian Hungwe


ban lifted
(MISA/IFEX) - On 26 March 2008, Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku set aside and declared the state-controlled Media and Information Commission's (MIC) ban against senior journalist Brian Hungwe null and void.

The Supreme Court's ruling comes hard on the heels of High Court judge Alfas Chitakunye's dismissal of an urgent application by Hungwe seeking nullification of a one-year ban from practising journalism imposed by the MIC, as provided for by the repressive Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA).

Following Justice Chitakunye's ruling, MISA's lawyer filed an appeal with the Supreme Court on 12 March.

According to the Chief Justice: ". . .in suspending the applicant (Hungwe), the MIC did not comply with Section 85 (3) of (AIPPA). The requirements of Section 85 (3) of the Act are compulsory and the failure to comply with them renders the actions of the MIC a nullity.

"In terms of Section 25 (2) of the Supreme Court Act, a judge of this court has powers to review proceedings of inferior tribunals such as the first respondent - MIC. In the exercise of such powers the respondents' suspension of the applicant is and is hereby set aside on the grounds that it is a nullity."

The ban against Hungwe was imposed under Section 79 of AIPPA, which deals with accreditation of journalists; yet a journalist can only be punished or banned under Section 85 (3) of AIPPA.

Accordingly, under that section, a journalist will be notified in writing of the proposed action and given opportunity to show cause within a reasonable time as to why the intended disciplinary measures should not be taken. Thereafter, the Commission will give the journalist in question a fair hearing and consider representations made before taking action.

In Hungwe's case, the mandatory disciplinary process was not complied with. It is further noted that the AIPPA Amendment Act, which took effect on 11 January, dissolved the MIC in whose place should now be the Zimbabwe Media Commission (ZMC), empowered to deal with the matters in question. The ZMC is still to be constituted.

Hungwe filed an urgent application with the High Court after the MIC, which had been given until 5 February to reverse its ban, failed to respond to a letter written by his lawyer. In his application, Hungwe was arguing that the ban was imposed without compliance with the disciplinary procedures specifically set out in the AIPPA.

Updates the Hungwe case: http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/91887


Media Institute of Southern Africa
21 Johann Albrecht Street
Private Bag 13386
misaalerts (@) gmail.com
Fax:+264 61 248016
More from Zimbabwe
  • MISA Zimbabwe State of the Media Report 2018

    In his inauguration speech on 24 November 2017 following Mugabe’s ouster, President Mnangagwa, said he would strengthen and ensure the pillars of democracy are respected in Zimbabwe. This raised hope that he would move with speed and implement outstanding socio-economic and political reforms ahead of the 2018 elections. It is common cause that the elections came without implementation of the envisaged reforms.

  • MISA Annual Report 2018

    The MISA Annual report for 2018 focuses on the lobby and advocacy work MISA carried out on critical issues throughout 2018.


    The Citizens' Analysis of Government Openness